Welcome! Becoming a registered user of ShortWingPipers.Org is free and easy! Click the "Register" link found in the upper right hand corner of this screen. It's easy and you can then join the fun posting and learning about Short Wing Pipers!

Page 3 of 16 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 151

Thread: The Eternal Alternator Choice Topic

  1. #21
    Frank Green's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Frankfort NY
    Posts
    843
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Eternal Alternator Choice Topic

    I followed Homer's lead and got a field approval for the Denso. Been running it for a couple of years now and it has been flawless. We used a 40 amp denso and controlled it down to 30 output by putting a 3 amp breaker on the field wire. I believe Homers and mine paperwork is on Andy's website. The only issue I had was the output stud on the alternator was pretty close to the exhaust pipe but I corrected that by taking the back end off and rotating it 180 to put it on top. I found some pics from when I did the install and the master box mod. I added a before pic also.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Frank Green; 05-23-2012 at 07:31 AM.
    -Super Stub-

  2. #22
    Clayton Harper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Seabrook, TX
    Posts
    1,346
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Eternal Alternator Choice Topic

    Frank,
    I know the Feds don't allow the use of the 337's approved data any more, but if I could get a copy of what you sent in for the field approval it would give me a starting point. If I didn't already have the Denso, I might just buy a Plane Power set up. If anyone has a suggestion please chime in.

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Independence Airpark Or
    Posts
    859
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Eternal Alternator Choice Topic

    I have a PlanePower on one plane and an orginal 20 amp generator on the other - 20 amps is plenty and the generator is simpler and only weighs 8 oz more than the PlanePower -(so called light alternator)

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Richmond, Texas
    Posts
    1,046
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Eternal Alternator Choice Topic

    Yep, I still have a Gen. on the Bonanza and Starduster 0-470. The way I see it if I want to make the plane lighter I'm the one that needs to lose the weight-50# Gens work great now with all the low amp draw.

  5. #25
    ysifly2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Poplar Grove, IL
    Posts
    454
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default The Eternal Alternator Choice Topic

    Quote Originally Posted by Clayton Harper View Post
    Frank,
    I know the Feds don't allow the use of the 337's approved data any more, ....
    I just completed two field approvals, one for installing the EI Fuel Gauge and one for B&C Alternator.
    The EI Fuel Gauge was solely based on a previous 337 field approval.
    The B&C Alternator was based upon the STC and FAA-PMA approved alternate for the PA18/19, a 337 field approval for the same on a Certified Pitts and 337 field approvals for previous, non-PMA versions of the B&C installs on PA22's. They did ask why I didn't choose to install the STC option available (i.e. plane power) and wanted me to refer to that STC.

    My position was as follows:

    "Please find attached the 337 for the subject mod to reference previously approved 337 field approvals for the B&C Alternator. Two of these approvals were for same type PA22 installs, but reference the part number for the B&C alternator as L40. This is the part number reference for the non-PMA alternator, prior to the availability of the FAA-PMA option of the BC400-2, as being utilized for this installation. Also referenced is a more recent installation of the B&C BC400-2 on a certified airplane other than the PA18/19 of the STC, in this case a Pitss S-2A via a 337 field approval.

    I have revised the subject 337 to reference the previously approved 337s of the same manufacture and alternator as felt that more appropriate. I am aware of the other STC option you noted via STC SA10682SC, this is supplied by a Plane Power. I don't see that it would be appropriate to reference that STC on the field approval, as the installation procedures and information for that installation are not being referneced for this installation.

    The B&C Alternator option were chosen for a few reasons, including the fact that it is a FAA-PMA approved component. While the model elgibility doesn't currently include the PA22-150 series, the PA18/19-150 are of same manufacturer (Piper), similar in firewall forward installation and electrical systems,and identical engine, in this case Lycoming O320. The BC400-2 alternator was also chosen to match up with a light weight starter being installed from B&C (STC with model elegibility including PA22) and using the PA18/19 STC installation instructions for the guidance on the 337 install.

    The B&C Alternator is a 40amp altenator weighing in a 6.1lbs, while the Plane Power is a 70amp alternator weighing 10lbs. For this installation on N4763A, day/night VFR airplane, the 40amps, at 80% max continuous per AC43.13, Ch 11, Sec 3, Par 11-33 & 11-36, provides 32amps supply for a total MAX load (all electical loads operating and transimitting) of 16.4amps, or ~50% of alternator capacity. Max continuous load is 12.5amps, resulting in ~40% of alternator derated capacity. Based upon this, the determination was to save the 4lbs versus additional over capacity of the alternator."


    In the end, they still wanted me to reference the PP STC... I complied and added a statement, after referring to install being based upon the PA18 STC and previous irks approvals and that it was "similar to STC PP"



    Bryan
    Last edited by ysifly2; 06-26-2014 at 07:51 PM. Reason: spelling

  6. #26
    Rick-CAS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Grain Valley, MO (E. Kansas City)
    Posts
    189
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Eternal Alternator Choice Topic

    That was probably my 337 for the B&C PA-18 STC on the Pitts S-2A. Easiest field approval I have ever done. Also did the same on a PA-22.

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    The Woodlands, Texas
    Posts
    180
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Eternal Alternator Choice Topic

    A friend has an interav alternator kit that he doesn't need and offered it to me for free. Is this thing worth the work to upgrade my old generator? Does anyone know how much weight it will save? I don't have interest in a lot of avionics, but a landing light might be nice someday...

  8. #28
    Administrator Steve Pierce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Graham, Texas, United States
    Posts
    15,493
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: The Eternal Alternator Choice Topic

    They are good units. You have to add a circuit breaker. The nice thing is that you have power when taxiing and at low power settings.

  9. #29

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Live in Clermont County, Ohio
    Posts
    360
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Eternal Alternator Choice Topic

    My 2 cents worth.... I agree with Steve. You have charging power at low power settings. Alternator conversion (B&C) was my first upgrade to my '55 tripe. I could then fly at night , and enjoy it with no worries.

  10. #30
    Gilbert Pierce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Germantown, Tennessee 01TN
    Posts
    4,438
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Re: The Eternal Alternator Choice Topic

    My InterAv has been trouble free for 14 years and 1200 hours.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •