Possible Rudder Airworthiness Directive

A couple simple observations here, on the TriPacer, the rudder is directly connected to the nose wheel, It is almost imposable to move the rudder side to side with the nose wheel on the ground as the friction of the tire on the ground (while parked) is greater than the leverage you can put on the training edge of the rudder without causing catastrophic failure of the trailing edge and ribs! For Pacers and other tailwheel aircraft, there are the tailwheel steering springs that restrict the movement of the rudder due to the wind. The interconnect has nothing to do with restraining the rudder while the airplane is stationary. Don't forget that there is the provision for removing the springs on the PA-22-150 and -160 if you install the nose gear centering springs.

Anyone that has done any research on this topic would know that the 2 failures the FAA is citing for the reason for the AD occurred on airplanes on floats, and both were in unairworthy condition as they both were missing the required ventral fin. Both also had beacons attached to the top of the rudder. FAA cited a couple additional rudders that were obtained from scrap bins. Since the origin of those rudders was unknown and have no relevance other than the fact that current inspection practices are effective since they were removed from service prior to an incident taking place.
 
dgapilot - Thank you for that. Water planes. Who would've guessed those rudders would rust?;)

I would also note that part of the 407 in the TCDS requires the replacement of the stock Tri-Pacer steering horn with the longer moment arm Colt steering horn, so to give more inflight "restoring force" to the springs acting upon the nose wheel. I only partly recall that it has something to do with the FAA's requirement for the plane to recover itself (unassisted) from a spin in some period - don't recall if it's based upon time, or altitude lost, or rotations...

As an aside comment, that's why I only have wheel pants on my mains. I noticed the front wheel steered too much when I put the front wheel fairing on. The plane handled a little weird, to me anyway. I'm going to reinstall it someday just to reaffirm my prejudice toward it. My prejudice may be from my preference to do some maneuvers, that most pilots don't do. I don't know. Did the FAA approve the TP for Utility Class (Spins) without fenders? Don't want to derail this string, but I'd like to know.
 
Last edited:
dgapilot - Thank you for that. Water planes. Who would've guessed those rudders would rust?;)

I would also note that part of the 407 in the TCDS requires the replacement of the stock Tri-Pacer steering horn with the longer moment arm Colt steering horn, so to give more inflight "restoring force" to the springs acting upon the nose wheel. I only partly recall that it has something to do with the FAA's requirement for the plane to recover itself (unassisted) from a spin in some period - don't recall if it's based upon time, or altitude lost, or rotations...

As an aside comment, that's why I only have wheel pants on my mains. I noticed the front wheel steered too much when I put the front wheel fairing on. The plane handled a little weird, to me anyway. I'm going to reinstall it someday just to reaffirm my prejudice toward it. My prejudice may be from my preference to do some maneuvers, that most pilots don't do. I don't know. Did the FAA approve the TP for Utility Class (Spins) without fenders? Don't want to derail this string, but I'd like to know.
That’s why it is what allows TriPacers in Utility Category, with the Colt steering arm, there are also centering springs for the nose wheel.
 
Back
Top